Triple E Framework Self-Evaluation
I used the Triple E Framework to evaluate my professional web presence development and instructional technology integration work during this week. The model created by Liz Kolb evaluates educational technology effectiveness based on its ability to support student learning objectives instead of focusing on tool selection. The framework consists of three fundamental elements that guide its operation.
- The technology successfully maintains student interest throughout the learning process according to the Engagement criterion.
- The technology enhances learning by providing additional content that traditional teaching methods cannot deliver.
- The Extension criterion assesses whether students can use their acquired knowledge in practical, real-world situations.
I used the self-assessment rubric to create a chart that displays my results in the three assessment domains. The following assessment results emerge from my evaluation process:
Engagement: I scored at the highest level in this category. I utilize technology to engage students through interactive polling, multimedia content, and collaborative tools, including Padlet and Jamboard. The tools I use, such as Canva and EdPuzzle, help students stay focused and interested in their work because they provide personalized learning experiences.
Enhancement: I demonstrate average proficiency in this area. I implement technology-based learning scaffolding through Google Forms quizzes for instant feedback and simulations and visualizations to make complex ideas more tangible. The current tools I use for learning support do not effectively transform student thinking and information-processing methods.
Extension: This represents the area where I need to develop my skills. I aim to enhance my practice by connecting academic content to real-world scenarios through case studies and authentic digital storytelling projects, although I currently do this only occasionally. My goal is to establish student blogging and digital portfolios and c
Community-based technology projects that enable students to apply learned material outside traditional classroom and library settings.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the Triple E framework, Cornell.
ReplyDeleteHi Cornell,
ReplyDeleteIt was interesting to compare your reflective process with the SAMR model I wrote about.
It sounds like we had a similar journey of identifying a comfortable area and a clear goal for growth. While I found I was most comfortable in the "Augmentation" stage, your strength is clearly in Engagement, and your use of interactive tools like Padlet and Canva. My husband loves using Wakelet and has shown me some cool things it can do so I think that's a great goal. Your focus on using technology to build real-world connections is so important. When you use tools like Wakelet or student blogs to "extend" the learning, are you thinking of having students share their work with the greater community or just with each other? Do you have any ideas/plans on how they can share that work out?
Thanks for sharing, Professor Mauliwere